Search for a command to run...
It is understandable because the fossil does look like it could be related to birds, even though O. khaungraae is probably a lizard.
It is confusing because it isn't clear what caused the researchers to think that O. khaungraae might be related to birds.
It is flawed because the researchers mistakenly assumed that O. khaungraae must be a lizard.
It is reasonable because the O. khaungraae skull is about the same size as the skull of the second fossil but is shaped differently.