Loading...
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{**Total revenue change (\$ in**} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{**Percentage change**} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{**Newspaper**} \\<br/>**Newspaper** & **thousands)** & **(\%)** & **size** \\ \hline Los Angeles Times & 93,966 & 12.5 & large \\ \hline The New York & 235,788 & 20 & large \\ Times & & & \\ \hline The Denver Post & -3,765 & -1 & small \\ \hline Sun Sentinel & -24,899 & -11.9 & small \\ \hline Chicago Tribune & 94,492 & 19 & large \\ \hline \end{tabular}<br/><br/>Digital paywalls restrict access to online content to those with a paid subscription. In an investigation of the effect of paywalls on newspaper company revenues for print and digital subscriptions and advertising, Doug J. Chung and colleagues compared actual outcomes (with a paywall) to control estimates (without a paywall). The researchers concluded that introducing a paywall is generally more beneficial for larger newspapers, which have high circulation and tend to offer a substantial amount of unique online content.<br/><br/>Which choice best describes data from the table that support Chung and colleagues' conclusion?